> "he attacked her" - is this true? We would first need to define "attacked". There are verbal attacks, chain-saw attacks, and much territory between them. Al

> "he attacked her" - is this true? We would first need to define "attacked". There are verbal attacks, chain-saw attacks, and much territory between them. Also, during the divorce proceeding, his soon-to-be-ex-wife primarily complained about his tendency to be lost in thought, not his tendency to attack her if she interrupted him. My point is that if he actually physically attacked her, she would not have needed to mention his annoying preference for calculus.