3 ms·
No, and beyond being inaccurate I'm beginning to think you are being intentionally misleading. He wants the doomsday scenario of choosing between (a) and (b) N
by pekk 13y ago
No, and beyond being inaccurate I'm beginning to think you are being intentionally misleading.
He wants the doomsday scenario of choosing between (a) and (b) NOT to occur. By making it clear how bad it would be.
- cwyers 13y agoBut his "doomsday scenario," where Debian has to drop support for all other inits or drop all support for GNOME, is a false dilemma. Debian can still support other init systems, for people who want them, while still letting GNOME depend on systemd if that's what's best for GNOME. Users who don't want systemd can run without a DE, or they can run a DE that doesn't require systemd. (GNOME isn't even the default DE for Jessie, that's Xfce.) So yes, he wants to make it clear how bad it would be, but he's also the one who's pushing for making it bad. It's not like he's just warning us that someone else will make Debian choose between those two things, he's trying to make Debian choose between them.