I do not agree. Coercive and "Pace-Setting" styles of leadership are not sustainable. They are tools to be used in specific situations but as a way of life co

I do not agree. Coercive and "Pace-Setting" styles of leadership are not sustainable. They are tools to be used in specific situations but as a way of life contribute to a work environment with much less effective outcomes and high turnover. (reference: http://hbr.org/2000/03/leadership-that-gets-results/ar/1 http://hbr.org/2000/03/leadership-that-gets-results/ar/1) I can't help but wonder if this type of attitude is what leads to cultures that are hostile to women and people of color.