8 ms·
I concur. The lack of detail seems bogus. Just because someone used Snowden's keyboard to log in once, theoretically allowing Snowden to intercept the password,
by crb002 13y ago
I concur. The lack of detail seems bogus. Just because someone used Snowden's keyboard to log in once, theoretically allowing Snowden to intercept the password, doesn't mean that that Snowden actually logged the guy's password. Seems like they want scapegoats.
- Breakthrough 13y agoI came here to say "you're only as strong as your weakest link", but I have to admit this is plausible as well. However, from a hacker perspective, what difference does it make? Social engineering tactics are widely known to be very effective in a lot of cases, and the NSA is no different. Snowden was accused in the past of trying to do this [1], although from his perspective (as well as mine, for that matter) he was probably just trying to explore the limits/boundaries of the systems he worked with [2]. I agree regarding the lack of details, and that this is probably a false report. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if Snowden actually gave it a shot - if you can find someone actually willing to just hand you their credentials, why wouldn't you? Although I understand they're trying to make Snowden look worse with this, I don't see that it does - if anything, it highlights his strengths as a security researcher, while simultaneously showing that the NSA is susceptible to the same social engineering flaws as have been demonstrated elsewhere. ---- [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/cia-warning-on-snowden-in-09-said-to-slip-through-the-cracks.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/cia-warning-on-snowden-... [2] http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131017/15530424921/snowdens-negative-writeup-cia-was-whistleblowing-taught-him-why-going-through-proper-channels-gets-punished.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131017/15530424921/snowde...