3 ms·
Umm. Not totally sure if you're making a joke or missing the point - there's no point making a lossless file from a lossy source, and even less point making a h
by eponeponepon 13y ago
Umm. Not totally sure if you're making a joke or missing the point - there's no point making a lossless file from a lossy source, and even less point making a higher-bitrate lossy version...
- chadwickthebold 13y agoCan you actually do that? Up-convert from a lossy source so that the file reads that it's 320kbps or whatever, but sounds like its coming out of an old telephone?
- eponeponepon 13y agoOf course :) A single generation from 128 to 320 wouldn't be too terrible, mind - it'd probably be noticeable to most people on half-decent speakers, but it wouldn't totally wreck the music. A second generation from that lossy-sourced 320 would probably start to get pretty grating, though. If you're thinking of doing it for artistic reasons, though, I'd say you're more likely to get better results from a judicious selection of high- and low-pass filters, with a flanger or two thrown in.
- fuzzywalrus 13y agoJust to expand on what eponeponepon said, digital generation loss (by transcoding/compression) sounds quite a bit different than analog generation loss.