> Well, people have children. The protection they feel must be absolute, and here is someone who threatening them. Meh.... While I was driving my two kids to

> Well, people have children. The protection they feel must be absolute, and here is someone who threatening them. Meh.... While I was driving my two kids to school today (in Jakarta), my youngest climbed on my lap. Where I am there are no laws against that, so I just kept driving. I think it is interesting that the people I know who have no kids fit your view of looking for absolute protection more than the actual parents I know. There's a certain point where, as a parent, you come to terms with the fact that the world is a dangerous place. > If someone came up to me on the street and screamed I'm going to fucking kill you, I wouldn't argue for his freedom of speech. This would be true especially if you knew the person and had reason to believe that the individual really intended to do that. On the other hand, if it was one of your bowling buddies you were slated to play with the next day and he came up to you and said, "Tomorrow, I am gonna fucking kill you with a 300!" I would totally say "free speech" and I wouldn't think he was going to bring over the elite Spartan guard and kill you with Greek swords or something..... So these things require context.