3 ms·
Due to the intricacies of ECC (the cryptography used in signing transactions) the signature can always be mutated to produce a different, but equally valid sign
by oillio 13y ago
Due to the intricacies of ECC (the cryptography used in signing transactions) the signature can always be mutated to produce a different, but equally valid signature.
If the developers want to avoid transaction malleability, they will not be able to include the signature in the hash.
- Anderkent 13y ago> If the developers want to avoid transaction malleability, they will not be able to include the signature in the hash. Would that be a problem? Since a transaction is already uniquely identified by the inputs, why not hash everything that's signed and use that as the identifier in (tx, index) pair?