4 ms·
Perhaps citing a television show is not the most credible evidence one can bring to a discussion? Edit (since I cannot reply directly, apparently): why is it n
by MrZongle2 13y ago
Perhaps citing a television show is not the most credible evidence one can bring to a discussion?
Edit (since I cannot reply directly, apparently): why is it not credible?
Can I start citing the X-Files or Star Trek? How about a broadcast of the Nancy Grace show?
- dinkumthinkum 13y agoYou really have trouble with this kind of discussion? I'm not sure what would fix this thinking ... Maybe you should read books or learn thought experiments or just start with basic metaphors ... hrrmphh! I'm stumped!
- thaumasiotes 13y agoTo illustrate a concept? Fictional media are ideal, as they can have the facts go however they want. What difference are you hallucinating between citing a philosophical paper discussing a thought experiment, and citing a television show?
- brnstz 13y agoWhy is it not credible? That scene illustrates a point even more abstract than the one we are discussing. If the result is the same (the prisoner dies), does it matter whether a legal authority performs the killing, or whether a mob does? I think it does. You may not agree with the legal authority's process or laws, but at the very least it is written down.
- steveklabnik 13y ago> (since I cannot reply directly, apparently) HN hides these links to prevent very quick back-and-forth. Either wait a few minutes or click the 'link' link.
- MrZongle2 13y agoThank you. I wasn't aware of that.