3 ms·
Those dynamic languages are only performant when you add a bunch of type information. You wind up writing a simulacrum of C and it still under-performs.
by a8da6b0c91d 13y ago
Those dynamic languages are only performant when you add a bunch of type information. You wind up writing a simulacrum of C and it still under-performs.
- lispm 13y agoThe idea is that there is some useful speed for much of the application by using native compilers. Higher speed might be needed only in parts of the program. Then a type inferencer, etc. comes to use. If that's still not enough one calls C or assembler routines - but, say, 95% of the application can be written in Lisp.