2001 was 19 years ago? I didn't know that. That attack is still being used as justification for all sorts of things as well some which are causing their own des

2001 was 19 years ago? I didn't know that. That attack is still being used as justification for all sorts of things as well some which are causing their own destabilizing effects. Also there have been other (arguably smaller) acts of domestic terrorism... The Boston Marathon bombing would be one example. And to quote your prior post: in any case, similar things happened in 1995, so no, I wouldn't categorize more of the same as an increase in instability. So by your example, things that happened in 1995 are 'more of the same' but when presented with a counter example in the same time span (and even more recently) it shows that things have changed (reduced instability) because it has been a significant period of time? Check. That makes sense. I'm checking out of this conversation. The contortions in your logic are just a bit too much for me. Carry on.