3 ms·
I've been in the industry for about a decade. All of the issues you're talking about stem from the confusion about whether telecom networks are private or publi
by josh2600 13y ago
I've been in the industry for about a decade. All of the issues you're talking about stem from the confusion about whether telecom networks are private or public assets. If telco assets are public, net neutrality and network unification are obvious. If they're private, they're not obvious at all. The industry position is to be public when it's beneficial and private when it's not, which is totally rational and emulated in almost every infrastructure company.
The solution is to nationalize the infrastructure and privatize the access but this is politically a non-starter. We will always have a compromise because of the quasi-public/private partnership that is infrastructure. It is better to treat this as a condition of the game theory that governs our universe than it is to complain about the lack of fairness in the system.
As far as microcells, they don't really solve the problem of spectrum in aggregate only for individuals and they're, at best, a stopgap solution. Proximal networking is a potential alternative worthy of consideration, but that's at least a few years away right now.
Source: I'm a Sprint MVNO and a Telco nut.
- Aloha 13y agoIn my opinion are privately owned, public assets, and while the network is privately owned, the spectrum is held in trust for the public, and duly licensed to the carriers to provide service. I don't believe in nationalization - I do believe private ownership with open access requirements is a better answer. I agree in re microcells - frequency reuse only gets you so far - and is only helpful at the levels proposed in very very dense places - like NYC/Tokyo/SF/London