4 ms·
We had been using this in earnest at my company since August. It's basically the best tool of its kind—and unlike most other tools of its kind, our copy editors
by shortformblog 13y ago
We had been using this in earnest at my company since August. It's basically the best tool of its kind—and unlike most other tools of its kind, our copy editors loved it. The thing it was missing was team-editing features. But it had the editing process, which is the one thing keeping people with Word, down.
There are a lot of publishing houses that could use something like this. Editorial workflow is a big weak point as we switch from doing a lot of things in print to doing a lot of things on the Web.
- emhart 13y agoTake a look at Draft: http://draftin.com http://draftin.com
- shortformblog 13y agoI'm familiar—I did a lot of testing. The problem with Draft, IMHO, is that it has a slightly higher complexity level, though the product itself is probably Editorially's closest match on the feature ratio. I need to be able to sell this to the average writer, and that's not always easy if the complexity level is too high, alas.
- emhart 13y agoI completely understand that. It definitely has a higher intimidation factor than Editorially ever did.