There are specific circumstances given in the actual law. The article conveniently ignores those circumstances. For starters, "dangerous materials" is very st

There are specific circumstances given in the actual law. The article conveniently ignores those circumstances. For starters, "dangerous materials" is very strictly defined -- it's stuff like toxic chemicals, radioactive materials, and other things that are so inherently dangerous that only a criminal would simply abandon them without taking safeguards. These aren't your run-of-the-mill household are commercial goods -- these are, at a minimum, industrial-strength shit.