4 ms·
People get up in arms about them being monopolies and their solution is to grant them monopolies. It's stupid. How about this? No monopolies at all. If I want
by dreamdu5t 13y ago
People get up in arms about them being monopolies and their solution is to grant them monopolies. It's stupid.
How about this? No monopolies at all. If I want to run cable and I get the easements, I should be able to...
- harshreality 13y agoSuppose there weren't any official monopoly grant from way-back-whenever to your existing local telco and cable companies. There would still be a de-facto monopoly or duopoly: The easement permitting process, currently entirely blocked due to the monopoly grants, would exist, but as a sham... with the (mono|duo)polies coercing city politicians not to let upstarts dig up roads or string new cables. I've lived in a city with lots of fiber being put in. It's a nuisance, and without vocal public support it's easy for entrenched ISPs to argue that the nuisance isn't worth the increased choice, particularly in markets where there is already "competition" between one [horrible] "cable" provider and one [horrible] "telco" provider.