3 ms·
Non WSJ Paywall article http://www.businessinsider.com/comcast-to-buy-time-warner-cable-2014-2?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+typepad
by mikeryan 13y ago
Non WSJ Paywall article
http://www.businessinsider.com/comcast-to-buy-time-warner-cable-2014-2?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+typepad/alleyinsider/silicon_alley_insider+(Silicon+Alley+Insider) http://www.businessinsider.com/comcast-to-buy-time-warner-ca...
This is crazy I don't see how this can get past any sort of anti-trust. Particularly with Comcast's stake in NBC. Comcast would own both the content and distribution of too large a chunk of the broadcast industry.
- fennecfoxen 13y agoTo go with non-WSJ paywall article: non-paywall WSJ article! https://www.google.com/search?q=http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303704304579379801986541412 https://www.google.com/search?q=http://online.wsj.com/news/a...
- jonknee 13y agoOr even better, I setup Chrome to use a referer of "google.com" for all requests to online.wsj.com--no paywall or need to search for headlines. I'm sure there are other ways, but the extension Referer Control makes this easy as can be: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/referer-control/hnkcfpcejkafcihlgbojoidoihckciin https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/referer-control/hn...
- karmajunkie 13y agooh that's beautiful... thanks for posting that!
- FLUX-YOU 13y agohttp://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/f-c-c-commissioner-to-join-comcast/ http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/f-c-c-commi... Well, this might be one way it goes through.