This article lacks any real substance, and perhaps that embodies my dislike of systemd in general. The demonstrate what I mean, I've modified the parent article

This article lacks any real substance, and perhaps that embodies my dislike of systemd in general. The demonstrate what I mean, I've modified the parent article, replacing "systemd" with "Windows", "sysv" with "Unix", and "init system" with "operating system", plus a bunch of other title changes to make it coherent, without really modifying the impression of the post: http://pastebin.com/sLsDVBG8 http://pastebin.com/sLsDVBG8 (Don't take it too serious.) Obviously this is just a bit of humor, but it sounds like something that could've been written in 1990, and the popular choice at the time has made at least a generation of developers and sysadmins suffer, and which some are still suffering from. I think the lesson we can learn is that "ideas" are not unimportant, and should be properly looked at before jumping to binding decisions, because what "solves your problem" now, may cause significantly more in the future.