4 ms·
* October 26, 2013
by hnha 13y ago
* October 26, 2013
- mjolk 13y agoWhat's your point? It's possible to have an enriching conversation and/or discuss things that are more than a few hours old.
- TheDom 13y agoSure, but it has been discussed before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6617497 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6617497
- mjolk 13y agoIs your assertion that the maximum utility of an topic is realized on the first discussion?
- thejosh 13y agoSure, so how often should content be recycled through HN?
- pessimizer 13y agoUntil people aren't interested in it any more.
- madvoid 13y agoIf it's about the NSA or Bitcoin, everyday.
- mjolk 13y agoThe site has a ranking system for posts that handle this question.
- nmc 13y agoTotally. However, in case said "things" are not from the current year, it is a habit on HN to include the date in the title — at least the year, like so: I challenged hackers to investigate me and what they found out is chilling (2013) Also, HN Search has just been drastically improved, so, when your "things" are not fresh from the morning, please use it to look for older submissions.
- DanBC 13y agoCurrent HN search is fucking terrible, especially on mobile.
- ndessaigne 13y agoCan you tell us what's terrible? We are always eager to improve it.
- hnha 13y agosorry, it was just meant as indicator that it was not new. I read it back then so if I had known it was not a new story I would not have clicked. That's all. :)