I suppose that's technically true, so I'll have to concede the point. However, I still maintain that it's not practically true, since it has a very different fl

I suppose that's technically true, so I'll have to concede the point. However, I still maintain that it's not practically true, since it has a very different flow than exceptions. Anyway, I assume you're the same pcwalton from Rust? I really like the design of error handling so far, especially the bit about trapping conditions. From what I read, it looks failure just kills the task, instead of the entire program (like it does in go if unhandled). I'm really looking forward to 1.0. Keep up the good work!