3 ms·
Actually, he does appear to explain &foo() later on, he just doesn't bother mentioning up front that it's completely different. I think if you consider it as a
by mst 13y ago
Actually, he does appear to explain &foo() later on, he just doesn't bother mentioning up front that it's completely different.
I think if you consider it as an academic piece, where you're supposed to read all of it and then think, it wouldn't be a bad introduction to perl as it was written in 2003.
- tredontho 13y agoOkay, I've read a few of Might's posts, and they're pretty interesting. But it irks me for some reason that nowhere in the posts can I find a date. Am I missing something? Where did you grab this 2003?
- mst 13y agoFrom the code. Were I to paranthesise the sentence, "perl as it was written in 2003" would be one clause.