5 ms·

The reason you write less code in Go is because there is less complexity. Similar to F# vs C#: http://fpbridge.co.uk/why-fsharp.html http://fpbridge.co.uk/why-

The reason you write less code in Go is because there is less complexity. Similar to F# vs C#: http://fpbridge.co.uk/why-fsharp.html http://fpbridge.co.uk/why-fsharp.html (checkout the call graph comparisons. I believe a Haskell call graph would be similar, but I could be very wrong.

bad_user 13y ago
Kind of ironic that for making a point on C#, you're using F#, an FP language.
- codygman 13y ago
  I don't see the irony. It's a contrast of a class based and object oriented language vs a functional language. The functional language leads to a much simpler call graph than the OOP language.
  - bad_user 13y ago
    The irony is that Go is not a functional programming language.
    - codygman 13y ago
      You're right. One of the reason it has simpler call graphs and less complexity is because it is composition based and struct rather than class based.