3 ms·
Good to know. Though thinking it thru, any unsupervised learning would have to have some reference points, be them hard codeded into the core system to ina for
by Zenst 13y ago
Good to know. Though thinking it thru, any unsupervised learning would have to have some reference points, be them hard codeded into the core system to ina form of supervised learnings. Otherwise the AI could recognise a cat but would know it by a completely different name and unless it had been given a good description of a cat to associate with such image forms or a picture with a label. Then it would never know what a cat was in the way we know them. Which may be a good or a bad thing. But if the AI referers to cats as 478912's then we would not know what it was on about and whilst it may be intellegent, it would be in a way that we would be unable to understand and relate too. Ironicly i suspect if you had a top end AI system and asked it what defined AI it may very well come back with the answer 42, which many would even understand, though no comprehend.
Fun feild of work still, I bet.
- StavrosK 13y agoWell, you can show it a photo of a cat and ask it "what's this?", and it'll say "this is a 478912". That's how clustering works. Obviously it's not going to just speak to you, but there are ways of extracting the categories out of it (obviously, otherwise why run it if you can't read the results?)!