4 ms·
Man I was with you right up until the last sentence, where you said "There's a place in life for both of them and one isn't intrinsically better than the other
by hyperbovine 17y ago
Man I was with you right up until the last sentence, where you said
"There's a place in life for both of them and one isn't intrinsically better than the other."
But one of the thems is life itself, so I would argue that yes, it is intrinsically better ;)
The internet is a great way to learn, communicate, and share information. It's also a great way to waste time, make yourself dumber, and develop a chronic lack of attention span. It should be used as a tool to help you live your life. But the phrase "life online" should never have existed.
- tdavis 17y agoIt's all subjective, though. What is intrinsically better about the "real world"? It's full of its share of dumb people (just walk outside). Working a 9-5 job filing paper is an awesome way to turn somebody into a lifeless moron. TV will help kill that annoying attention span. I have no desire to live completely online, but I think people have a tendency to argue that the "real world" is more important since it has a pretty basic thing in common with us: we're both corporeal. But, imagine if you could truly live in The Internet: you'd have instant access to most of the world's collective knowledge and the ability to interact with millions of people simultaneously. That'd be pretty impressive!
- maneesh 17y agoI find that my attention span is way less after quitting TV and going only online...now, I can barely watch a 30 minute tv show without grabbing my computer to check stats, and an hour tv show (or a movie, god forbid) are basically totally out of the question.
- caffeine 17y agoYou couldn't kiss any of those people, though.
- jacquesm 17y agoThat's by far the best comment in this whole thread. Interaction online is purely cerebral, even the more kinky versions of it. The ultimate in platonic contemplation, just you, your computer and your internet connection. It makes you wonder what the long term effects of the www are.
- byrneseyeview 17y agoBut one of the thems is life itself, so I would argue that yes, it is intrinsically better ;) No, one of them has this weird, inconsistent, visual-audio-tactile-olfactory user interface, and the other one is generally standards-compliant and can be accessed with lynx.
- run4yourlives 17y agoSpeak for yourself, but the internet has made me smarter in many ways, not dumber. This has been my choice, sure. I can tell you however that I would never have read half of the interesting and intellectually stimulating thoughts and ideas without the internet.
- randallsquared 17y agoIndeed. I think the internet is worth a std deviation. Before I was 25 or so, I spent the vast majority of my time bored, and the dozens-to-hundreds of questions I idly wondered about each day were largely unanswered and unanswerable, in aggregate. The world has changed, and while I can handle a few days or a week offline, I don't want to, if I can help it; the internet is where the answers are.
- caffeine 17y agoThat's sort of true - but I've noticed a much more troubling phenomenon. My questions are increasingly tending to be those that are answerable by the internet. I used to regularly wonder who I really am and why I'm here - now, I've given up on all that and primarily look up interesting stuff on Wolfram Mathworld.
- trafficlight 17y agoThe internet can still help with the "who I am" and "why I'm here" questions. There are so many readily available viewpoints out on the internet that I can use to help shape my worldview. Certainly many more than the predominantly white, Christian home state.
- jordyhoyt 17y ago"But one of the thems is life itself, so I would argue that yes, it is intrinsically better ;)" All of this is life itself. No experience you can have is more like life than any other.