The existence of papers about software is a decent step in the right direction, but it needs: a. People to cite what software they used way more heavily than t

The existence of papers about software is a decent step in the right direction, but it needs: a. People to cite what software they used way more heavily than they do (this includes me). b. The effort to be rewarded in and of itself. A paper, cited or not, is credit. There's a huge leap of faith that, after all the time prepping software for release that anyone will use it.