3 ms·
Not sure if it's just the anonymity, it also has to do with the fact that the community is much bigger Without anonymity, the larger the social-surface area, t
by 001sky 13y ago
Not sure if it's just the anonymity, it also has to do with the fact that the community is much bigger
Without anonymity, the larger the social-surface area, the greater the attack surface is. This is why as facebook grows, it becomes less useful. And why, when it was started, it was successful based on its "exclusiveness" (.edu), and not the other way around.
The "real reason" people wan't to eliminante online anonymity are two fold: (1) money; and (2) power.
Advertising and fascism both require manipulative social leverage, and having data-sets with non-anonymous correlations provides the tools to fight the old wars of the 20th century.
The forces at work are dark and powerful and likely to win. They run through Silicon Valley and its establishment just like they do the east coast. Becuase at this stage, the one is just spending the money of the other...deep symbiotic linkages mean the one cannot do without the other.
- avn2109 13y agoWhat did you read that gave you these ideas? It seems like a genuinely interesting hypothesis and I'd like to find out more.
- lovemenot 13y agoFirst of all, I apologise in advance if this comment does not actually apply to you. Obviously I don't know what you were really thinking, but I see a lot of comments here with the form: xyz seems genuinely interesting, please elaborate. I often surmise that the poster really disagrees and just intends to set up a line of attack using a disingenuous first approach. Especially where, as in this case, the parent seems unreasoning. Whether or not that was your intent, at least some people might read comments of this form as being disingenuous.
- avn2109 13y agoNope not being pedantic. Actually interested.