3 ms·
>the quality of the linked articles was not all that great Why? >You out of hand have dismissed each article posted by the parent and have provided nothing of
by aestra 13y ago
>the quality of the linked articles was not all that great
Why?
>You out of hand have dismissed each article posted by the parent and have provided nothing of your own to talk about the flaw you perceive in those item
Exactly.
>If you point out ones that specifically refute my points, I am happy to read them.
I did. That's what I posted. I spent time and effort compiling them. I first gave a summary of all the research and then I posted it.
This is a cyclical argument.
- facepalm 13y agoI looked at the first two. The first was just a small article about employers trying to discern if a woman wants to have children or not. Why did you even link to that? I commented on the second one - it certainly seems interesting, but there was bias apparent already in the second paragraph. How can you expect me to read 15 articles you dump on me? At least give me a reason why they are relevant, or pick two or three? Unfortunately number of quotes doesn't make them more true. I would be interested in articles that show the meat. For example with the classrooms, show me the article that says how the study was conducted. How many classrooms did they watch? Did they try different schools? Different countries? Different cultures?