3 ms·
This is a shame. Their Android tablets were misguided, and never likely to be competitive, but the e-ink readers were the only things really competitive with th
by fidotron 13y ago
This is a shame. Their Android tablets were misguided, and never likely to be competitive, but the e-ink readers were the only things really competitive with the e-ink Kindles.
I always thought if they had opened up the Android e-ink reader market more then they could have created a viable niche in reference applications, which are a surprisingly lucrative sector.
- falcolas 13y agoI always appreciated the nook tablets, not as readers, but as low-cost and fully featured android tablets.
- fidotron 13y agoYeah, I'm not knocking the actual products they got made, just that there's no way B&N had the resources to compete with the likes of Google, Amazon and every other Android tablet manufacturer and make a decent margin. In picking their battles that wasn't a wise one to walk into.
- Fasebook 13y agoThere is still a lot of room in the e-ink market. Everybody is just afraid to enter because of patent law.
- callahad 13y agoHave you checked out Kobo's e-ink readers? From a hardware perspective, I actually prefer the Kobo Aura to my own Kindle Paperwhite 2.
- fidotron 13y agoI've not tried the latest ones, but the earlier ones just had a distinctly unfinished and rushed vibe to them. Kind of neat, but hacked together. It doesn't help that I'm in the Canadian market, and for a while Kobo existed simply as an e-reader to take advantage of the fact it was more easily available here than the Kindle, so I think we were exposed to rougher versions of the initial product than elsewhere.
- KerrickStaley 13y agoI've had horrible luck with Kobo: my first died after 6 months, it took 5 weeks for Kobo to get me a replacement on warranty, and the replacement died after 1 month. I'd strongly recommend sticking with Amazon, if only for the fast replacement turn-around.