Twitter is not competing with that cat. At all. The comparison tells us absolutely nothing meaningful at all: you can be wildly successful and have less users t

Twitter is not competing with that cat. At all. The comparison tells us absolutely nothing meaningful at all: you can be wildly successful and have less users than TTC, or you can have way more users than TTC and be doing terribly. In no way, shape, or form should TTC be used as a measuring stick for Twitter's value or success. Again, I think it's sort of an interesting statistic, but featuring it so prominently is designed to hold the comparison up as something Very Meaningful & Insight™... which it just isn't, and I can't begin to fathom the rationale for why it would be.