rythie said, "Apple's emerging threat is Linux/Open Source, because " [reasons] to which you (mikecuesta)replied "I don't think for a second that Linux/Open

rythie said, "Apple's emerging threat is Linux/Open Source, because " [reasons] to which you (mikecuesta)replied "I don't think for a second that Linux/Open Source is an emerging threat to OS X, " with no rationale or logic to support that viewpoint. "I don't think X", without supporting reasons is an almost meaningless response in a discussion. I am surprised it got so many upvotes. Just imagine someone responded to you with "Oh yeah? I do think so" without providing any rationale. Your response could validate rythie's "classical innovator's dilemma" argument, since in a classic innovator's dilemma the proponents of the disrupted product never "think for a second" that the disrupting product is "an emerging threat" till it is too late.