4 ms·
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-June/011521.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-Jun... Anyone has more infor
by ithkuil 13y ago
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-June/011521.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-Jun...
Anyone has more information about this from the kernel perspective ? Will systemd be the only API ? Sounds strange.
- sandGorgon 13y agoThis is a reasonable evaluation of the status - https://lwn.net/Articles/575672/ https://lwn.net/Articles/575672/ Basically, if you use systemd as the init system, then yes - it is the only API [1] . If you dont want to use systemd then there are alternate implementations of the cgroup API (e.g. cgmanager - http://cgmanager.linuxcontainers.org/ http://cgmanager.linuxcontainers.org/ ). IMHO, they are both incompatible with each other. Lennart has a reasonable justification of why systemd is implementing it's own API [2] [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/557111/ https://lwn.net/Articles/557111/ [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/557140/ https://lwn.net/Articles/557140/