I think people are much better at evaluating whether the totality of a situation is good/bad, vs. why specifically that situation is bad. There's no question m

I think people are much better at evaluating whether the totality of a situation is good/bad, vs. why specifically that situation is bad. There's no question much of the US response to 9/11 has been bad -- internationally (wars...) and domestically (perpetual state of war, civil liberties losses, etc.). Articulating which changes, particularly technological, are good and bad individually is a lot harder. And it seems to be harder for people the closer they are to the situation emotionally.