Just remember where the bread is buttered, pedestrians = homeless panhandler but car = customer. I'm not sure if you're trolling or just a bit tone-deaf, but t

Just remember where the bread is buttered, pedestrians = homeless panhandler but car = customer. I'm not sure if you're trolling or just a bit tone-deaf, but this is an incredibly US-centric way to see things. Seriously, it makes you seem a bit clueless. Clearly, the mindset you voice here is something that city planners in the US need to take into account. The question is, where does this difference come from, and can something be done about it? After all, cars and all the infrastructure surrounding them take up an enormous amount of space, which seems wasteful in the design of efficient and compact cities. How can those inner cities be "revived" in a way that makes them livable?