2 ms·
Did it have a 1080p high-quality IPS screen, too? As I said, either the specs or the quality of the specs/materials suffer, to account for the Windows license.
by higherpurpose 13y ago
Did it have a 1080p high-quality IPS screen, too? As I said, either the specs or the quality of the specs/materials suffer, to account for the Windows license.
- bitwize 13y agoIt has a 1280x800 high-quality IPS screen.
- josteink 13y agoSpecs-wise it's a lot better than my 2013 Nexus 7. 2 GiB RAM, a quad-core Atom, and 64 GiB of onboard storage. Followed by It has a 1280x800 high-quality IPS screen. So spec-wise, it has more storage, but apart from that, it has the same amount of RAM, and a display completely inferior to the 2013 Nexus 7. I don't know about you, but I would trade storage for display anytime. You can always download/stream content from the cloud, but it's hard to stream a better display.
- bitwize 13y agoMore storage and a more powerful CPU. Those actually count for a lot. I don't actually notice the low resolution of the display unless I look hard.
- mercer 13y agoI think this clearly shows that different people have different needs, and that perhaps Microsoft needs to pick a crowd. Most 'regular' users I know care a great deal more about a great display than storage. My mom would pay a premium for the former (although perhaps she specifically would actually not care and just want an intuitive interface so she can get to her games and email).