3 ms·
I'm not so sure this is entirely true, especially with pid namespaces becoming a real thing. The true pid1 could be greatly simplified for the sake of system st
by stormbrew 13y ago
I'm not so sure this is entirely true, especially with pid namespaces becoming a real thing. The true pid1 could be greatly simplified for the sake of system stability while providing sub-pid1s that handle actual service, device, and application management.
- adobriyan 13y agoEveryhing in pidns is destroyed when pidns init dies.
- stormbrew 13y agoI'm not sure what you're getting at here. Yes, that is obviously true. As is the case with the true pid1 init. Care to expand?
- adobriyan 13y agoI mean if you protecting yourself from panic by moving stuff from real PID 1 into pidns root, you're doing it wrong. pidns root will segfault and kernel will SIGKILL everything inside which is equivalent to good old panic.