3 ms·
I don't get it. The Shuttle project included a lot of things that had never been done before. So things didn't quite go to plan and some people died? But in
by samplonius 13y ago
I don't get it. The Shuttle project included a lot of things that had never been done before. So things didn't quite go to plan and some people died? But in the mean time, it performed useful tasks.
Predicting failure is easy, because something will always go wrong. There hasn't been a perfect anything built yet.
What is also surprising about these dredged up past articles, is that they all invariable criticize the engine (SSMB/SSME), even though the engine was never a major issue. Yes, the rebuilds between flights took longer than expected, but it was the first ever re-usable engine and is still an amazing achievement.
- gus_massa 13y agoFeynman explains the problems with the main engines in the report about the Challenger disaster. They were a good candidate for the 3rd deadly accident if the shuttle program had continued. Current discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7201645 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7201645 (125 points, 1 day ago, 79 comments)