4 ms·
I am not familiar with Wolfram's style, but there seemed to be an unsatisfying lack of Alex Smith, but lots of Me, NKS, and PCE, in that post. The headline dese
by whacked_new 19y ago
I am not familiar with Wolfram's style, but there seemed to be an unsatisfying lack of Alex Smith, but lots of Me, NKS, and PCE, in that post. The headline deserves note because the proof is by a 20-yo but the post doesn't do him justice.
Interesting nevertheless and I hope to get to read more news about the author.
- amichail 19y agoThis blog post comes from the humble version of Wolfram!
- koolmoe 19y agoHere are some alternative sources: http://www.newscentre.bham.ac.uk/press/2007/10/24Oct07Turingprize.shtml http://www.newscentre.bham.ac.uk/press/2007/10/24Oct07Turing... http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071024/full/news.2007.190.html http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071024/full/news.2007.190.ht... The second link is particularly informative.
- Nate 19y agoThere are always two underlying themes in all Wolfram's writings: 1) Wolfram is a genius: the next Newton. 2) Buy Mathematica.
- dangph 19y agoHe really is a genius though.
- deleted 19y ago[deleted]