http://ip6.nl/#!mi5.gov.uk http://ip6.nl/#!mi5.gov.uk 0 stars http://ip6.nl/#!fbi.gov http://ip6.nl/#!fbi.gov 3 stars - yay hope http://ip6.nl/#!cia.gov ht

http://ip6.nl/#!mi5.gov.uk http://ip6.nl/#!mi5.gov.uk 0 stars http://ip6.nl/#!fbi.gov http://ip6.nl/#!fbi.gov 3 stars - yay hope http://ip6.nl/#!cia.gov http://ip6.nl/#!cia.gov 3 stars again My ISP, nope, BBC again no. Would appear the UK in no rush to move into IPv6, least publicly. Bet some people wondering what IRC is like over IPv6 and others wondering why Snowden never warned us about the lack of intelegence support of IPv6. If he did, then things would improve, but until people are forced into a corner then nothing will change. I just think it is sad how IPv6 could of been and still can be pushed via mobile phone usage and in that case it is an area which makes 4G voice calls and easier from what I have heard (least networking level). Certainly the need is there in the mobile market, just support elsewere and it is not even a chicken and egg situation more a case of slowly dripping into excistance. That all said it is such an investment in skills and effort for a demand that can just use an alternative. That and the NAT been abused so well that the biggest area (mobile networking) has been fine without it. Just makes it hard to justify, even if current hardware and software support it. One does not just go IPv6 overnight without some business tears.