3 ms·
This argument seems to apply equivalently to VAT/sales tax, which in my mind makes it weak. (Consumers are already taxed on their income etc) There's no reason
by ronaldx 13y ago
This argument seems to apply equivalently to VAT/sales tax, which in my mind makes it weak.
(Consumers are already taxed on their income etc)
There's no reason to believe total taxes collected will decrease. If actors still benefit from HFT post-taxation, they will still trade, and pay the tax.
- vasilipupkin 13y agoSorry but you are clueless. Taxing the trading itself will raise the cost of trading, this making it less profitable if it is less profitable people will do less of it.
- gd1 13y agoVAT is paid on the difference between what you obtained a good/service for and what you sold it on at. The clue is in the name - "value added". You can even get a refund if you make a loss. A transaction tax would be charged at both ends whether or not you make a profit.