3 ms·
Old. Seriously who hasn't read this by now.
by phhh 13y ago
Old. Seriously who hasn't read this by now.
- vbuterin 13y agoI haven't, for one.
- thenerdfiles 13y agoDo souls have cryptographic hashes?
- asveikau 13y agoIf so maybe they should change the hash function, according to this short story billions of collisions have been found.
- kordless 13y agoAssuredly they do. It's intriguing you replied with this comment to the guy that will probably bring that to pass for all software processes.
- thenerdfiles 13y agoI know exactly who I asked this of, and that's why I asked it of him.
- kordless 13y agoThat would imply we're all thinking the same thing then. That continues to be interesting to me.
- thenerdfiles 13y agoThat we could all be considering a concept that has, even if true, a statistically insignificant measurable signature? God: Oh yes, yes! Souls... I remember those. Great idea at the time. Yeah, I wrote those a loooong time ago. They're causally insignificant now, I'm pretty sure. Obviously it's all automated by now. Or something Stephensonian, like the protofestering of a fledgling clan of digital spiritalists secretly brooding over the core belief-set of Hackerdom as it is scripted?
- thenerdfiles 13y agowhom*, you baboon.
- AznHisoka 13y agoI haven't either. Go back to Reddit.
- asveikau 13y agoI see what you did there. You're saying that if one of us read it we all did. Because we're the egg. Brilliant.
- jessaustin 13y agoWho hasn't written it?
- pikachu_is_cool 13y agoHonestly I have read this before too but it was in a 4chan screenshot, know I know it's just copypasta
- admnor 13y agoUnless it's had seven billion hits, I'd say a few people haven't. I was one of them.