3 ms·
I used to work on software purchased by the DoD, and the amount of access control, logging, auditing, and other related security features required to fulfill th
by stevep98 13y ago
I used to work on software purchased by the DoD, and the amount of access control, logging, auditing, and other related security features required to fulfill the requirements was astounding.
I totally agree with you that the apparent openness of the intelligence networks information systems is the most newsworthy aspect of this. I don't think that journalists are really knowledgeable at all about intelligence community is supposed to handle compartmentalization. They think the NSA handles things just like they do at their paper.
(The sad part is that apparently, the journos are right.)
The problem of these loopholes allowing classified information to leak was exposed with Bradley Manning. Yet, even in that case, I didn't hear any calls from the press or public to see head further up the chain roll.
But, that should have been enough to highlight the holes in our networks. Apparently it wasn't, and exactly the same thing has happened again.
I want to see heads roll right up the chain for this lack of duty with respect to protecting our national secrets.
By the way, none of the above is intended to imply that I think what the NSA has been doing is legitimate. I am glad that Snowden came public with this information. However, how do we know that other, more critical secrets haven't been sold directly the the Chinese or North Koreans? We only found out about the Snowden leaks because he made them public.
- saraid216 13y agoIt's worth noting that there was a lot of noise about too much siloing in the intelligence community resulting in allowing 9/11. Arguably, this kind of openness is a consequence of that.