3 ms·
http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/230 http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/230 is 3 years old (and still paying :))
by sashazykov 13y ago
http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/230 http://bitcoinpyramid.com/r/230 is 3 years old (and still paying :))
- sashazykov 13y agoMoreover it was the first profitable pyramid. Income: 751.63949374 btc Deposits: 692.04538439 btc Donations (ads): 59.59410935 btc Expenditure: 748.05864780 btc Withdrawals: 739.21264780 btc
- dclara 13y agoscammed: ponzi is a SCAM I copy-pasted from the site. BTW, any pyramid scheme is bad and should be prohibited, right? But the site is cool though.
- tobz 13y agoI wouldn't recommend a pyramid schema. You'll run into migration problems down the road. Better to keep it flat.
- dclara 13y agoI guess we are talking about difference things. Sorry, I meant Pyramid scheme: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_scheme https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_scheme But regarding pyramid schema, you mean hierarchical structure, right? I have the same concern, but flat tagging does not help much as we can observe from many sites. Let people browsing from multiple levels of the category is fun. The rule of thumb is: don't expect perfect structure and don't need to have everybody agree on that. Ad hoc hierarchy should be good enough like Amazon product list. Also keep it away from people who don't need to browse it.
- plumeria 13y agoI think it was a joke?
- dclara 13y agoIt's a nice practice and showing people how he can manage this type of thing. Couldn't be serious about it, even the real-time data might be fake. There are a lot of people like to participate in the BTC game, it's not bad. But if people take it seriously, it may impact on BitCoin's credibility.