4 ms·
Original article is much more informative. http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/tech-industry/3501030/german-court-finds-domain-registrar-liable-for-torrent-sites-co
by Snoddas 13y ago
Original article is much more informative.
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/tech-industry/3501030/german-court-finds-domain-registrar-liable-for-torrent-sites-copyright-infringement/ http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/tech-industry/3501030/german...
- JungleNavigator 13y agooh..., you are right, I should have submitted that instead (pity I can't change URL now)
- qwerta 13y agoAnd totally different from the post here. > The Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe had already ruled that DENIC is generally not liable for rights violations, the verdict showed. > However, the Regional Court of Saarbrücken found that the rights violations of h33t.com were obvious and easy to identify, said Brüß. > Since the album was still shared through h33t after several requests sent to the website's operator by Key-Systems to stop the infringing activity, the registrar had to act to stop the infringement, the court found.