On the contrary. "refute" is defined as: > refute - v, prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove. I contend that this section does disprove

On the contrary. "refute" is defined as: > refute - v, prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove. I contend that this section does disprove the theory that Capistrano cannot continue to be licensed under the MIT License: > that in this circumstance the copy-left of the GPL does not cross the boundary of Rubygems (Capistrano hints to Rubygems that it would like to use SSHKit). And that even using the LGPL with it's provision for "dynamic linking" being an exception adds nothing to the discussion for scripting languages. Of course, this is all semantics.