4 ms·
Reading the paper, they make a lot of assertions that are a bit too confident like this plant is most definitely X and this is obviously Y. This is an interesti
by codezero 13y ago
Reading the paper, they make a lot of assertions that are a bit too confident like this plant is most definitely X and this is obviously Y. This is an interesting idea but just because they resemble some plants doesn't make them those plants all things considered.
Original article http://cms.herbalgram.org/herbalgram/issue100/hg100-feat-voynich.html?ts=1391822845&signature=f780cf05ea21924547b2bfd7ce241b67 http://cms.herbalgram.org/herbalgram/issue100/hg100-feat-voy...
- ttctciyf 13y agoPreviously on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7108472 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7108472
- semiel 13y agoThe top comment on this link has a nice explanation of why the offered explanation is unlikely to be a sufficient one. I find the claims intriguing, but a full decryption would definitely take more.
- leoc 13y agoHere's someone else taking a http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2014/01/21/brand-new-new-world-nahuatl-voynich-manuscript-theory http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2014/01/21/brand-new-new-worl... go at the paper, too.