4 ms·
You're neglecting growth: https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1391806800000&chddm=981801&chls=Inte
by milkshakes 13y ago
You're neglecting growth: https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=maximized&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1391806800000&chddm=981801&chls=IntervalBasedLine&cmpto=NASDAQ:GOOG&cmptdms=0&q=NYSE:XOM&ntsp=0&ei=U0b1Usi0OuOtiAKvkgE https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&...
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- diminish 13y agoOne Question remaining is when Google's market value will surpass Apple's. That'll likely happen before the end of this year, so get ready for the repetition of the same HN discussion, replacing Apple with Exon.
- scoofy 13y agoThis is a reasonable thing to point out. When valuing equities, i tend to use a strategy out of the playbook of a less famous fund manager, John Neff. That is, one that includes total return. Indicator: Neff Ratio = (EPS growth rate + dividend yield)/PE This is similar to the inverse of PEG, a much more common indicator, but it includes yield as part of total return. It's one of my primary screens when looking for equities, because both Exxon and Google would have good marks, even though their return would be from different sources.