3 ms·

You're probably right - I think that's more valuable to coordinate rather than a mandatory kill switch.

• jimktrains2 13y ago
  I whole-heartedly agree.
• joosters 13y ago
  But how? I can't see any realistic chance of a broad international agreement. Remember that it works both ways, too. What would you do if your phone stopped working because a telecoms company in (say) Nigeria accidentally asserted that your IMEI was stolen? Saying "wouldn't it be great if the world could co-ordinate" is not the answer as it isn't realistic. It's avoiding the problem and the need to come up with practical solutions. Or even an honest "it can't be done" answer.
  • fossuser 13y ago
    That makes sense - an earlier response to my comment about how apple handles things with user PINs is probably a better approach.
  • noselasd 13y ago
    Surely carrier A wouldn't let carrier B be able to block an imei belonging to their customers. If carrier B did block it though, you, customer of carrier A, wouldn't be able to roam in the network of carrier B - but still work fine in your home network of carrier A. However, that results in carriers needing to assert ownership over an imei, which would be come quite a mess - so it very well could not be done. I do believe national blacklisting registers of imeis, as already done for many years in certain european countries is much better than not doing it though.