3 ms·
The worst part might be him putting part of the blame as an aside to the women with "distressed babies." It seems awfully small for a CEO of a Fortune 1000 to p
by kilocycling 13y ago
The worst part might be him putting part of the blame as an aside to the women with "distressed babies." It seems awfully small for a CEO of a Fortune 1000 to pin this cost-cutting decision, even partially, on two people.