3 ms·
Yeah, paying at less than the advertised wage is insulting. Unless they give you the 20% of the first three months back after the probationary period.
by billynomates1 13y ago
Yeah, paying at less than the advertised wage is insulting. Unless they give you the 20% of the first three months back after the probationary period.
- madaxe_again 13y agoWe do. It a) offsets our risk and b) gives them a tangible goal to shoot for.
- whichdan 13y agoHow is saving $6k at best doing anything other than making your new employee resentful?
- cryoshon 13y agoYou forgot c) lets you take 3 months of work out of someone at %80 of the price. It's scummy.
- madaxe_again 13y agoRight, but as I said, after the three months, we settle the difference - and it's not 80% either, actually, more like 7%, but hey ho. We've never had anyone object, and it's pretty common practice.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- illuminate 13y ago"It a) offsets our risk" You could simply hire better employees rather than disrespecting your candidates. I wouldn't bother pretending that it has anything to do with "risk management". At best, you sound extremely cheap. At worst, it makes you sound like you repeatedly make poor hiring decisions and scramble to adjust for this.