6 ms·

More info here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=719408 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=719408

• deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
• csomar 17y ago
  did you mean http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=719408 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=719408 ?
  • ScottWhigham 17y ago
    Pfft - why would people downvote this? Come on, people...
    • deleted 17y ago
      [deleted]
      • shizcakes 17y ago
        Because it's obviously the same as the link 30 pixels away. Which also damages the "hrm... Oh!" factor of the original.
    • riklomas 17y ago
      Because it was only funny the first time
    • wmeredith 17y ago
      Yeah, when someone cracks a joke at a party and then someone says it again right after following a laugh, it doesn't always go so well.
      • raintrees 17y ago
        Maybe the second poster just needed to be less complete... One of my high school buddies would do this (only once per audience, granted). I would tell a joke. People would laugh. Then he would start telling the same joke, trailing off when people started looking at him funny, ending with "Well, it was funny when HE told it!"
• messel 17y ago
  http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/936v3/can_you_sum_up_recursion_in_programming_in_about/c0bakml http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/936v3/can_you_s...
  • messel 17y ago
    Ouroborus or reddit is the hated party here?
    • run4yourlives 17y ago
      recursive, not redundant.
      • messel 17y ago
        Whew 14 points in the hole on the snake link. Note to self, commenting is dangerous!, just submit, submit, submit... Bah, I knew there was a reason I always hated recursion (except for parsing). The negative pointage just goes to prove it.
• oz 17y ago
  You prick! You got me. Nice one.