4 ms·
What I found strange -- The heatmap seemed to go from "eye to product" in the left heatmap. However, on the right heatmap there wasn't any significant distinct
by jwilliams 17y ago
What I found strange -- The heatmap seemed to go from "eye to product" in the left heatmap.
However, on the right heatmap there wasn't any significant distinction in the heatmap at all. (I presume the heatmap is a differential, therefore it's a net on that one map rather than an absolute difference between the two).
Either way, from the explanation I'd have still expected the right heatmap to focus on the eye-contact of the model? Whereas the actual example seem to suggest when the model is looking directly at us we somewhat ignore it?
Edit: Oh ok. For some reason, the non-linkjacked article does have a more significant heatmap around the eye contact... I wonder why this article has a different map? have they modified it?
http://www.bunnyfoot.com/articles/not_focus_groups.htm http://www.bunnyfoot.com/articles/not_focus_groups.htm
See http://www.bunnyfoot.com/img/sun4.jpg http://www.bunnyfoot.com/img/sun4.jpg vs http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-content/uploads/Bryan/heatmap_sunsilk.png http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-content/uploads/Bryan/heatmap_s... (right map)
- arketyp 17y agoIf that's the non-linkjacked article, how come it has lower res pictures? Good find though. As for the stronger heat intensity on the shifting eyes (on either source), I guess one could explain it as the subject going back and forth investigating (probably somewhat subconsciously) what exactly she is looking at.
- sili 17y agoCoincidentally, what a great way to protect your content from linkjacking, a la Digg. Post the article with intentionally wrong content and than fix it afterwards.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]