http://disastr.org http://disastr.org I know I've discussed this here before, but this is exactly the kind of scenario that the system would handle - 300,000 d

http://disastr.org http://disastr.org I know I've discussed this here before, but this is exactly the kind of scenario that the system would handle - 300,000 displaced people in an area with massive network connectivity, trying to figure out where to go. These Web 2.0 sites are showing the outline of what is possible, but they don't have the granularity (i.e. individual people looking for help) that could be managed with a dedicated system. The shelter, by the way, just came up on Wired. So, c'mon, somebody bite - tell me why your mapping tech and my shelter design couldn't work for the next fire season. http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/multimedia/2007/10/gallery_instant_housing?slide=8&slideView=6 http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/multimedia/2007/10/ga...